this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)
General Discussion
425 readers
50 users here now
Discuss anything GunCAD related. If you need help, see /c/help. If you think you're discussing a thing a lot of the time, consider making your own separate community.
Abide by the global rules or be smitten.
Shitty stock image may be changed at moderator discretion.
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hey Ill give your paper a read, thanks for your work. Icant stress enough how important is the work of the devs to the community. I think I once saw an even harder TPU, but that is probably another dead end. I agree that the artistic filaments are a dead end as well, but not everything is what it seems, ie I can't find much concrete data on that CF PLA from Creality but according to some it has better layer adhesion than some non CF PLAs. And dr Gaspar tested the Tinmorry CF PETG that also had better later adhesion than vanilla.
There can be a lot of performance variation across brands which makes generalization really difficult. But when it comes to PLA-CF, the primary thing it's gaining (stiffness) is the one thing that PLA doesn't really need. If you're going to try to anneal it, the CF can really help with dimensional stability. Otherwise, you can almost always find a higher performing non-reinforced version.
As for PETG-CF, it still suffers from extremely low impact strength. That's just an inherent property of PETG and adding CF usually makes it worse. That doesn't mean it's not usable. In fact, there's a video of Middleton shooting a 500 Beowulf upper on a GAP lower printed in PETG-CF. But that's a case of really knowing your performance requirements (the GAP has a bolt-on metal buffer tower) and how to dial in your print settings to get the most out of the material. Most people aren't at that level, and that's the main reason why you see experienced folks playing it safe with recommendations.