this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

General Discussion

424 readers
96 users here now

Discuss anything GunCAD related. If you need help, see /c/help. If you think you're discussing a thing a lot of the time, consider making your own separate community.

Abide by the global rules or be smitten.

Shitty stock image may be changed at moderator discretion.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
14
PPA-CF vs PA6-CF? (forum.guncadindex.com)
submitted 2 months ago by ItsBildo to c/general
 

PPA-CF vs PA6-CF?

Does anyone have experience printing PPA-CF and PA6-CF? I had read that "PPA-CF is 48% stronger" than PA6 if you get good layer adhesion, but I'm seeing conflicting info regarding impact resistance. Anyone have input who's printed and used both?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Cecilsteadman420 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Salt annealing isn't needed, but from my experience my salt annealed ppa vs regular annealed ppa is a huge different. I cut a notch in my printer rail and smacked it with a hammer (I swear on my life) at least 20 times and the part didn't even bend a little. I had to sit there pushing with a soldering iron for more than 5 minutes to break off a picatinny rail

[โ€“] Kopsis 1 points 2 months ago

Annealing results in more uniform crystalization which generally reduces impact strength. If your salt annealed parts showed higher impact strength, that's an indication that the annealing was actually unsuccessful.