this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)
General Discussion
425 readers
51 users here now
Discuss anything GunCAD related. If you need help, see /c/help. If you think you're discussing a thing a lot of the time, consider making your own separate community.
Abide by the global rules or be smitten.
Shitty stock image may be changed at moderator discretion.
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think making the DIY barrel should be the first priority. For the chamber a usual method of ECM can't be used so my idea is to use a linear motor that travels along the taper with precise timing to remove more material at the start and less at the end to create a smooth ramp. This paired with a copper ring that would selectively reduce one small section at a time. A lot of these DIY processes for ECM seem to have too many variables for failure, in my opinion it is more ideal to have a standardized system for ECM to prevent outside variables impeding accuracy. This can be done by printing everything (even the container) and making the motor/ECM process itself controlled with a microcontroller.
Just to note I'm not sure if this idea for ECM is even physically possible as I'm not experienced with it.
I recall that Jeffrod was working on a more precise method of ECM that may be similar to what you're describing. No idea where that ever landed.
There's a question I feel that should be asked more - why aren't chamber reamers used more widely as part of the "DIY barrel" process? Are these reamers unobtainable outside of the US? I recall looking at that a while ago and it did appear they could be shipped worldwide.
Seems like a high-risk item to purchase, higher-risk than any other bought component.